Bailable Warrant and Summons

 Bailable warrants and summons both have different natures. A bailable warrant and a summons are two different forms of legal process issued by the Supreme Court of India in exercising its criminal jurisdiction.
A bailable warrant is issued when a person fails to appear in court despite being served with a summons or when a person is accused of a bailable offence and is not in custody. The bailable warrant requires the person to present themselves at the court and to be taken into custody, if necessary. The person can secure their release by posting bail, which is a sum of money that guarantees they will attend court when required.
 On the other hand, a summons is a formal request for a person to attend court in response to a complaint or a criminal charge. A summons is typically issued when the person is accused of a non-bailable offence but they are not in custody. The person must attend court on the date specified in the summons, failing which the court may issue a warrant for arrest. In summary, a bailable warrant is issued when a person fails to appear in court or is accused of a bailable offence. In contrast, a summons is issued when a person is accused of a non-bailable offence but is not in custody. The difference between the two lies in the consequences of failing to comply with them, with a bailable warrant allowing for release on bail, while a summons may result in a warrant for arrest.
 
Main Difference between Warrant and a Summons
A warrant and a summons are two different forms of the legal process used in criminal cases. The main differences between the two are:
Purpose: A warrant is issued to bring a person into custody, while a summons is issued to require a person's appearance in court.
 Issuance: A warrant is typically issued when a person has failed to appear in court despite being served with a summons or when a person is accused of a crime and is not in custody. A summons is typically issued when a person is accused of a crime but is not in custody. 
Consequences: If a person fails to comply with a warrant, they can be arrested and taken into custody. If a person fails to comply with a summons, they can be found in contempt of court, which can result in fines or imprisonment. 
Bail: In case of a warrant, the person can secure their release by posting bail, which is a sum of money that guarantees they will attend court when required. In the case of a summons, the person is typically released on their own recognizance, meaning they promise to appear in court without having to post bail.
 Enforcement: A warrant is enforced by law enforcement agencies, while a summons is typically served by a court official. 
In summary, the main difference between a warrant and a summons lies in their purpose, issuance, consequences, bail, and enforcement. A warrant is used to bring a person into custody, while a summons requires a person's appearance in court.